Can raid1 ensure that data are always duplicated on different devices
>> AND take advantage of all available space?
>
> Depends on the relative sizes of the devices. If your largest
> device is bigger than the rest put together, then you'll lose some
> space.
>
> Hug
.
> Thanks
>
> > Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:46:05 +0100
> > From: h...@carfax.org.uk
> > To: miaous...@hotmail.com
> > CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [raidX vs single/dup]
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:40:57PM +00
tage of all available space?
Regards,
Sam
> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:32:33 +0100
> From: h...@carfax.org.uk
> To: miaous...@hotmail.com
> CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [raidX vs single/dup]
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at
devices. If your largest
device is bigger than the rest put together, then you'll lose some
space.
Hugo.
> Regards,
> Sam
>
>
>
> > Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:32:33 +0100
> > From: h...@carfax.org.uk
> > To: miaous...@
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:22:49PM +, miaou sami wrote:
> Hi btrfs guys,
>
> could someone explain to me the differences in mkfs.btrfs:
>
> - between -d raid0 and -d single
In RAID0, data is striped across all the devices, so the first 64k
of a file will go on device 1, the next 64k will
