Re: BTRFS balance segfault, where to go from here

2014-10-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Since it's not an option here I've not looked into it too closely > personally, and don't know if it'll fit your needs, but if it does, it > may well be simpler to substitute it into the existing backup setup > without rewritin

Re: BTRFS balance segfault, where to go from here

2014-10-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:12 AM, E V wrote: > I've seen dead locks on 3.16.3. Personally, I'm staying with 3.14 > until something newer stabilizes, haven't had any issues with it. You > might want to try the latest 3.14, though I think there should be a > new one pretty soon with quite a few btrfs

Re: BTRFS balance segfault, where to go from here

2014-10-28 Thread Duncan
Stephan Alz posted on Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:33:12 +0100 as excerpted: > And about the "data not being important to backed up", hell yes it is so > yesterday I did a "backup of the backups" to a good old XFS filesystem > (something which is reliable). Makes sense. FWIW, my second backup is to reise

Re: BTRFS balance segfault, where to go from here

2014-10-28 Thread E V
0 > [Tue Oct 28 12:03:35 2014] [] ? getname_flags+0xbc/0x1a0 > [Tue Oct 28 12:03:35 2014] [] ? __do_page_fault+0x298/0x540 > [Tue Oct 28 12:03:35 2014] [] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x81/0x4d0 > [Tue Oct 28 12:03:35 2014] [] ? do_brk+0x198/0x2f0 > [Tue Oct 28 12:03:35 2014] [] ? SyS_ioctl+0xa0/0

Re: BTRFS balance segfault, where to go from here

2014-10-28 Thread Stephan Alz
? SyS_ioctl+0xa0/0xc0 [Tue Oct 28 12:03:35 2014]  [] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [Tue Oct 28 12:03:48 2014] btrfs: found 16561 extents Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 at 1:07 AM From: Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BTRFS balance segfault, w

Re: BTRFS balance segfault, where to go from here

2014-10-27 Thread Duncan
Chris Murphy posted on Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:51:16 -0600 as excerpted: > On Oct 27, 2014, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Alz wrote: >> >> My question is where to go from here? What I going to do right now is >> to copy the most important data to another separated XFS drive. >> What I planning to do is: >> >

Re: BTRFS balance segfault, where to go from here

2014-10-27 Thread Chris Murphy
On Oct 27, 2014, at 3:26 AM, Stephan Alz wrote: > > My question is where to go from here? What I going to do right now is to copy > the most important data to another separated XFS drive. > What I planning to do is: > > 1, Upgrade the kernel > 2, Upgrade BTRFS > 3, Continue the balancing. Def