Oops, please scratch the attachment of the mail before, that patch is
not yet finished. I forgot to remove it before hitting the send button :(
Sorry.
> I'll send a patch tomorrow to prevent the scrub crash in this situation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrf
On 5/2/2012 5:22 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:01:04PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote:
>> ./btrfs device delete missing /mnt/sda3
>> ERROR: error removing the device 'missing' - Input/output error
>>
>>
>> Apr 30 13:17:57 evo kernel: [ 108.866205] btrfs: allowing degraded mo
> Is there anything I missed for steps to reproduce it?
All the story is in previous mails.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/16829
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg15949.html
First mail is missing from mail-archive...
Summary:
Some damaged sectors on
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 04:59:03PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:42:05PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote:
> > > Apr 19 17:38:41 evo kernel: [ 347.661964] [] >
> > > btrfs_ioctl_dev_info+0x15c/0x1a0 [btrfs]
[...]
> I was on 3.4-rc5!
You really saw this crash with 3
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:01:04PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote:
> ./btrfs device delete missing /mnt/sda3
> ERROR: error removing the device 'missing' - Input/output error
>
>
> Apr 30 13:17:57 evo kernel: [ 108.866205] btrfs: allowing degraded mounts
> Apr 30 13:17:57 evo kernel: [ 108.8662
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:54 PM, David Sterba wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:42:05PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote:
> > Apr 19 17:38:41 evo kernel: [ 347.661915] Call Trace:
> > Apr 19 17:38:41 evo kernel: [ 347.661964] [] >
> > btrfs_ioctl_dev_info+0x15c/0x1a0 [btrfs]
> > Apr 19 17:38:4
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:42:05PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote:
> Apr 19 17:38:41 evo kernel: [ 347.661915] Call Trace:
> Apr 19 17:38:41 evo kernel: [ 347.661964] [] >
> btrfs_ioctl_dev_info+0x15c/0x1a0 [btrfs]
> Apr 19 17:38:41 evo kernel: [ 347.662013] [] >
> btrfs_ioctl+0x571/0x6c0 [b
Hi all,
today another episode... I have compiled and tried kernel 3.4-rc5
./btrfs fi sh
Label: 'RootFS' uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96
Total devices 3 FS bytes used 1006.67GB
devid3 size 1.75TB used 357.00GB path /dev/sdb3
devid1 size 1.75TB used 1.34TB
Today I tried scrub...
Apr 19 17:36:01 evo kernel: [ 187.932297] device label RootFS devid 1
transid 47046 /dev/sda3
Apr 19 17:36:02 evo kernel: [ 188.145858] device label RootFS devid 3
transid 47046 /dev/sdb3
Apr 19 17:36:19 evo kernel: [ 205.483044] device label RootFS devid 1
transid 47046
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Marco L. Crociani
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:46 PM, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:39:12PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote:
>>> Apr 14 18:07:52 evo kernel: [ 431.054709] btrfs: relocating block
>>> group 1401002393600 flags 17
>>> Apr 1
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:46 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:39:12PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote:
>> Apr 14 18:07:52 evo kernel: [ 431.054709] btrfs: relocating block
>> group 1401002393600 flags 17
>> Apr 14 18:08:14 evo kernel: [ 453.506541] btrfs csum failed ino 362
>>
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:39:12PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote:
> Apr 14 18:07:52 evo kernel: [ 431.054709] btrfs: relocating block
> group 1401002393600 flags 17
> Apr 14 18:08:14 evo kernel: [ 453.506541] btrfs csum failed ino 362
> off 910946304 csum 432355644 private 175165154
The failed
12 matches
Mail list logo
