Re: FIBMAP unsupported

2014-10-04 Thread Marc Dietrich
On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 14:15:11 +0100 Filipe Manana wrote: > Just tried it and I confirm filefrag's call to ioctl FS_IOC_FIEMAP fails > with -EEXIST. > > It's actually a known issue affecting any of the 3.17 RCs (except RC1). > The extent map manipulation/merging is broken for some cases. Try with >

Re: FIBMAP unsupported

2014-10-03 Thread Filipe Manana
On 10/02/2014 11:11 PM, Marc Dietrich wrote: > Am Donnerstag 02 Oktober 2014, 21:55:55 schrieb Marc Dietrich: >> Will try to restore the file using btrfs restore > > ok, restore worked. I did some more tests. This is unrelated to CoW. It seems > that the "fallocate -n" in combination with "

Re: FIBMAP unsupported

2014-10-02 Thread Marc Dietrich
Am Donnerstag 02 Oktober 2014, 21:55:55 schrieb Marc Dietrich: > Will try to restore the file using btrfs restore ok, restore worked. I did some more tests. This is unrelated to CoW. It seems that the "fallocate -n" in combination with "dd conv=notrunc" using large files (>10G) triggers it.

Re: FIBMAP unsupported

2014-10-02 Thread Marc Dietrich
Am Donnerstag 02 Oktober 2014, 19:25:49 schrieb David Sterba: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:13:22PM +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote: > > I have a large (25G) virtual disk on a btrfs fs. Yes, I know this is not > > optimial. So I try to defrag it from time to time. However, using "btrfs > > fi > > defrag

Re: FIBMAP unsupported

2014-10-02 Thread Hugo Mills
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:25:49PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:13:22PM +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote: > > I have a large (25G) virtual disk on a btrfs fs. Yes, I know this is not > > optimial. So I try to defrag it from time to time. However, using "btrfs fi > > defrag -c

Re: FIBMAP unsupported

2014-10-02 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:13:22PM +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote: > I have a large (25G) virtual disk on a btrfs fs. Yes, I know this is not > optimial. So I try to defrag it from time to time. However, using "btrfs fi > defrag -c vm.vdi" results in even more fragments than before (reported by > fi