Thanks everyone for the helpful and detailed responses.
Now that you confirmed that everything is fine with my FS, I'm all
relaxed because I can for sure live with the output of df.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 10.09.2017 23:17, Dmitrii
10.09.2017 23:17, Dmitrii Tcvetkov пишет:
>>> Drive1 Drive2Drive3
>>> X X
>>> X X
>>> X X
>>>
>>> Where X is a chunk of raid1 block group.
>>
>> But this table clearly shows that adding third drive increases free
>> space by 50%.
FLJ posted on Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:45:42 +0200 as excerpted:
> I have a BTRFS RAID1 volume running for the past year. I avoided all
> pitfalls known to me that would mess up this volume. I never
> experimented with quotas, no-COW, snapshots, defrag, nothing really.
> The volume is a RAID1 from day
Am Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:15:52 +0200
schrieb Ferenc-Levente Juhos :
> >Problem is that each raid1 block group contains two chunks on two
> >separate devices, it can't utilize fully three devices no matter
> >what. If that doesn't suit you then you need to add 4th disk. After
>
> > Drive1 Drive2Drive3
> > X X
> > X X
> > X X
> >
> > Where X is a chunk of raid1 block group.
>
> But this table clearly shows that adding third drive increases free
> space by 50%. You need to reallocate data to actually
10.09.2017 19:11, Dmitrii Tcvetkov пишет:
>> Actually based on http://carfax.org.uk/btrfs-usage/index.html I
>> would've expected 6 TB of usable space. Here I get 6.4 which is odd,
>> but that only 1.5 TB is available is even stranger.
>>
>> Could anyone explain what I did wrong or why my
10.09.2017 18:47, Kai Krakow пишет:
> Am Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:45:42 +0200
> schrieb FLJ :
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have a BTRFS RAID1 volume running for the past year. I avoided all
>> pitfalls known to me that would mess up this volume. I never
>> experimented with quotas,
>Problem is that each raid1 block group contains two chunks on two
>separate devices, it can't utilize fully three devices no matter what.
>If that doesn't suit you then you need to add 4th disk. After
>that FS will be able to use all unallocated space on all disks in raid1
>profile. But even then
> @Kai and Dmitrii
> thank you for your explanations if I understand you correctly, you're
> saying that btrfs makes no attempt to "optimally" use the physical
> devices it has in the FS, once a new RAID1 block group needs to be
> allocated it will semi-randomly pick two devices with enough space
@Kai and Dmitrii
thank you for your explanations if I understand you correctly, you're
saying that btrfs makes no attempt to "optimally" use the physical
devices it has in the FS, once a new RAID1 block group needs to be
allocated it will semi-randomly pick two devices with enough space and
>Actually based on http://carfax.org.uk/btrfs-usage/index.html I
>would've expected 6 TB of usable space. Here I get 6.4 which is odd,
>but that only 1.5 TB is available is even stranger.
>
>Could anyone explain what I did wrong or why my expectations are wrong?
>
>Thank you in advance
I'd say df
Am Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:45:42 +0200
schrieb FLJ :
> Hello all,
>
> I have a BTRFS RAID1 volume running for the past year. I avoided all
> pitfalls known to me that would mess up this volume. I never
> experimented with quotas, no-COW, snapshots, defrag, nothing really.
> The
12 matches
Mail list logo