On 02/14/2014 02:56 AM, Brendan Hide wrote:
> On 14/02/14 05:42, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
>>> On 2014/02/10 04:33 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>> Do you happen to know which git repository and branch is
>> preferred to base patches on? I'm getting ready to write one to
>> fix this, and would
On 14/02/14 05:42, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2014/02/10 04:33 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
Do you happen to know which git repository and branch is preferred to
base patches on? I'm getting ready to write one to fix this, and would
like to make it as easy as possible for the developers t
On 02/10/2014 08:41 AM, Brendan Hide wrote:
> On 2014/02/10 04:33 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>>
>> Apparently, trying to use -mconvert=dup or -sconvert=dup on a
>> multi-device filesystem using one of the RAID profiles for metadata
>> fails with a statement to look at the kernel log, which d
On 2014-02-10 08:41, Brendan Hide wrote:
> On 2014/02/10 04:33 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>>
>> Apparently, trying to use -mconvert=dup or -sconvert=dup on a
>> multi-device filesystem using one of the RAID profiles for metadata
>> fails with a statement to look at the kernel log, which doesn'
On 2014/02/10 04:33 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
Apparently, trying to use -mconvert=dup or -sconvert=dup on a
multi-device filesystem using one of the RAID profiles for metadata
fails with a statement to look at the kernel log, which doesn't show
anything at all about the failure.
^ If this i
I've experienced the following with balance:
Setup:
- Kernel 3.12.9
- 11 DVD sized (4.3GB) loopback devices.
(9 Read-Only Seed devices + 2 Read/Write devices)
- 9 device seed created with "-m single -d single" and made
Read-only with "btrfstune -S 1 ..."
- 2 devices was added at different dates. N
