Re: Managing large volumes

2014-01-02 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, Tim Cuthbertson wrote: > I am a bit confused and I have probably managed to outsmart myself. > For about 15 months, I have been running my system on a single, large > btrfs volume. It is RAID-0 on two SATA-III HDD's for a total of 1.9 > TB. This is a home system running Siducti

Re: Managing large volumes

2014-01-02 Thread Kai Krakow
Tim Cuthbertson schrieb: > I am a bit confused and I have probably managed to outsmart myself. > For about 15 months, I have been running my system on a single, large > btrfs volume. It is RAID-0 on two SATA-III HDD's for a total of 1.9 > TB. This is a home system running Siduction (Debian Sid) L

Re: Managing large volumes

2014-01-02 Thread Duncan
Tim Cuthbertson posted on Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:28:33 -0600 as excerpted: > I am a bit confused and I have probably managed to outsmart myself. For > about 15 months, I have been running my system on a single, large btrfs > volume. It is RAID-0 on two SATA-III HDD's for a total of 1.9 TB. This > is

Re: Managing large volumes

2014-01-02 Thread Chris Murphy
On Jan 2, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Tim Cuthbertson wrote: > > Am am at a point where I would like to do a fresh install of my OS > without losing my home and data contents. And I do not think separate > btrfs subvolumes will help me on that. Is that correct? Is there a way > to prevent an OS installati