On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:09 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> Just to kick the tires, I tried the same test that I ran last week on
> ext4. Everything was going great, I decided to kill it after 6 million
> files or so and restart.
>
> The unmount has taken a very, very long time - seems like we are
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 15:23 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> >>> [ lock timeouts and stalls ]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Ok, I've made a few changes that should lower overall contenion on the
> >>> allocation mutex. I'm getting better performance on a 3 million file
> >>> run, please give it a shot.
> >>
> >>
Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 14:29 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 09:46 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Just to kick the tires, I tried the same test that I ran last week on
ext4. Everything was going great,
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 14:29 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 09:46 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> Just to kick the tires, I tried the same test that I ran last week
> on
> ext4. Everything was going
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 09:46 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>
> >> Just to kick the tires, I tried the same test that I ran last week on
> >> ext4. Everything was going great, I decided to kill it after 6 million
> >> files or so and restart.
> >>
> >>
Chris Mason wrote:
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 08:19 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 18:35 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:09 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Just to kick the tires,
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 08:19 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 18:35 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> >
> >> Chris Mason wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:09 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Just to kick the tires, I tried the sam
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 18:35 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:09 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Just to kick the tires, I tried the same test that I ran last week on
ext4. Everything was going great, I decided to kill it after 6
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 18:35 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:09 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> >
> >> Just to kick the tires, I tried the same test that I ran last week on
> >> ext4. Everything was going great, I decided to kill it after 6 million
> >> fil
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:09 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Just to kick the tires, I tried the same test that I ran last week on
ext4. Everything was going great, I decided to kill it after 6 million
files or so and restart.
The unmount has taken a very, very long time - seems
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:09 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> Just to kick the tires, I tried the same test that I ran last week on
> ext4. Everything was going great, I decided to kill it after 6 million
> files or so and restart.
>
> The unmount has taken a very, very long time - seems like we are
Chris Mason wrote:
Hello everyone,
It took me much longer to chase down races in my new data=ordered code,
but I think I've finally got it, and have pushed it out to the unstable
trees.
There are no disk format changes included. I need to make minor mods to
the resizing and balancing code, but
12 matches
Mail list logo
