Hi Dave,
On 24 September 2010 20:39, Dave Cundiff wrote:
>>> It shouldn't but it depends on how much metadata we have to read in to
>>> process the snapshots. Could you do a few sysrq-w? We'll see where you
>>> are spending your time based on the traces.
>>
>> Also, using 'perf' may give a good
>> It shouldn't but it depends on how much metadata we have to read in to
>> process the snapshots. Could you do a few sysrq-w? We'll see where you
>> are spending your time based on the traces.
>
> Also, using 'perf' may give a good picture of where the time is spent, eg:
>
> $ sudo perf record
On 22 September 2010 01:02, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:27:03AM -0400, Dave Cundiff wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:19 PM, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
>> > Do you have any kernel processes running constantly? Any taking near 100%
>> > of a CPU?
>> >
>> > --rich
>> >
>>
>> N
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:27:03AM -0400, Dave Cundiff wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:19 PM, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
> > Do you have any kernel processes running constantly? Any taking near 100%
> > of a CPU?
> >
> > --rich
> >
>
> Now that I look again, it seems that the btrfs-cleaner pro
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:19 PM, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
> Do you have any kernel processes running constantly? Any taking near 100% of
> a CPU?
>
> --rich
>
Now that I look again, it seems that the btrfs-cleaner process is
still running. CPU isn't much of an issue on this box. Its a dual quad
Do you have any kernel processes running constantly? Any taking near 100% of a
CPU?
--rich
On Sep 20, 2010, at 14:24, Dave Cundiff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a btrfs backup system that has been running great. Its been
> backing up 6 systems with 500-750 gigs of data using Rsync and
> snapshots.
