Re: Qgroup accounting issue on kdave/for-next branch

2016-11-29 Thread Jeff Mahoney
On 11/29/16 10:56 AM, Jeff Mahoney wrote: > On 11/29/16 1:36 AM, Chandan Rajendra wrote: >> When executing btrfs/126 test on kdave/for-next branch on a ppc64 guest, I >> noticed the following call trace. >> >> [ 77.335887] [ cut here ] >> [ 77.336115] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID

Re: Qgroup accounting issue on kdave/for-next branch

2016-11-29 Thread Jeff Mahoney
On 11/29/16 1:36 AM, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > When executing btrfs/126 test on kdave/for-next branch on a ppc64 guest, I > noticed the following call trace. > > [ 77.335887] [ cut here ] > [ 77.336115] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8325 at > /root/repos/linux/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c

Re: Qgroup accounting issue on kdave/for-next branch

2016-11-29 Thread Chandan Rajendra
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 04:41:41 PM Qu Wenruo wrote: > > At 11/29/2016 04:21 PM, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 03:55:53 PM Qu Wenruo wrote: > >> At 11/29/2016 02:36 PM, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > >>> When executing btrfs/126 test on kdave/for-next branch on a ppc64

Re: Qgroup accounting issue on kdave/for-next branch

2016-11-29 Thread Qu Wenruo
At 11/29/2016 04:21 PM, Chandan Rajendra wrote: On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 03:55:53 PM Qu Wenruo wrote: At 11/29/2016 02:36 PM, Chandan Rajendra wrote: When executing btrfs/126 test on kdave/for-next branch on a ppc64 guest, I noticed the following call trace. [ 77.335887] [

Re: Qgroup accounting issue on kdave/for-next branch

2016-11-29 Thread Chandan Rajendra
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 03:55:53 PM Qu Wenruo wrote: > At 11/29/2016 02:36 PM, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > > When executing btrfs/126 test on kdave/for-next branch on a ppc64 guest, I > > noticed the following call trace. > > > > [ 77.335887] [ cut here ] > > [ 77.33

Re: Qgroup accounting issue on kdave/for-next branch

2016-11-28 Thread Qu Wenruo
At 11/29/2016 02:36 PM, Chandan Rajendra wrote: When executing btrfs/126 test on kdave/for-next branch on a ppc64 guest, I noticed the following call trace. [ 77.335887] [ cut here ] [ 77.336115] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8325 at /root/repos/linux/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:2443 .

Re: Qgroup accounting issue on kdave/for-next branch

2016-11-28 Thread Qu Wenruo
Thanks for the detailed reports and reproducer. I'll investigate it soon. Thanks, Qu At 11/29/2016 02:36 PM, Chandan Rajendra wrote: When executing btrfs/126 test on kdave/for-next branch on a ppc64 guest, I noticed the following call trace. [ 77.335887] [ cut here ]