Re: Question of stability

2010-09-22 Thread Chris Mason
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:04:57PM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > Chris Mason, Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:13:07 -0400: > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:10:08PM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > >> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lub

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-22 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Chris Mason, Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:13:07 -0400: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:10:08PM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: >> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: >> >> No, not stable! >> >> >> >> Again, after powerloss

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread K. Richard Pixley
On 9/18/10 17:43 , C Anthony Risinger wrote: I remeber someone recently using it for continuous build servers successfully That's probably me and I wouldn't call the effort "successful" yet. There are at least several outstanding problems including the limit on the number of links to a file.

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:12 AM, K. Richard Pixley wrote: >  On 9/18/10 17:43 , C Anthony Risinger wrote: >> >> I remeber someone recently using it for >> continuous build servers successfully > > That's probably me and I wouldn't call the effort "successful" yet.  There > are at least several ou

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread Chris Mason
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 02:21:15PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400 > Chris Mason wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > > > No, not stable! > > > > > > Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread Stephan von Krawczynski
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400 Chris Mason wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > > No, not stable! > > > > Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems. > > Please tell me more about your system. I do extensive power fail > testing here

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread Chris Mason
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:10:08PM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > >> No, not stable! > >> > >> Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems. > > > > Plea

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread Lubos Kolouch
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: >> No, not stable! >> >> Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems. > > Please tell me more about your system. I do extensive power fail > testing here wi

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread Chris Mason
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > No, not stable! > > Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems. Please tell me more about your system. I do extensive power fail testing here without problems, and corruptions after powerloss are very often caus

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread Lubos Kolouch
No, not stable! Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems. /home and also the backup volume, as the backup was running :( Both show parent transid verify failed on wanted . found and the volumes cannot be mounted. So until there is a way to somehow recover fr

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-19 Thread Chris Samuel
On 19/09/10 07:37, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following > progress for some more. Are there any chances of btrfs stabilizing, > as in terms of usability in production? If so, how far are we from this? I've been using btrfs in anger for a

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-19 Thread Hugo Mills
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:55:34AM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > - Original Message - > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > > wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following > > > progress for some more. Are t

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-18 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: >> Stable is a pretty subjective term; many don't even think ext4 is >> stable. I've used it on my personal machine since .30-31-ish without >> problems, and on a server w/raid 1 for about a year (btrfs + lxc is >> niiice, for VMs) also

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-18 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> Stable is a pretty subjective term; many don't even think ext4 is > stable. I've used it on my personal machine since .30-31-ish without > problems, and on a server w/raid 1 for about a year (btrfs + lxc is > niiice, for VMs) also free of problems. > > However, if you've been on the list you kno

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-18 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Sep 18, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > - Original Message - >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk >> wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following >>> progress for some more. Are there any chances of b

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-18 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
- Original Message - > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > wrote: > > Hi all > > > > I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following > > progress for some more. Are there any chances of btrfs >stabilizing, > > as in terms of usability in production?

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-18 Thread Hendrik Fabelje
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > Hi all > > I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following progress > for some more. Are there any chances of btrfs >stabilizing, as in terms of > usability in production? If so, how far are we from this? Hi, I a