2017-08-01 23:21 GMT+03:00 Leonidas Spyropoulos :
> On 01/08/17, E V wrote:
>> In general I think btrfs takes time proportional to the size of your
>> metadata to mount. Bigger and/or fragmented metadata leads to longer
>> mount times. My big backup fs with >300GB of metadata takes over
>> 20minute
On 01/08/17, E V wrote:
> In general I think btrfs takes time proportional to the size of your
> metadata to mount. Bigger and/or fragmented metadata leads to longer
> mount times. My big backup fs with >300GB of metadata takes over
> 20minutes to mount, and that's with the space tree which is
> si
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
wrote:
> Hi Duncan,
>
> Thanks for your answer
In general I think btrfs takes time proportional to the size of your
metadata to mount. Bigger and/or fragmented metadata leads to longer
mount times. My big backup fs with >300GB of metadata takes
Hi Duncan,
Thanks for your answer
On 01/08/17, Duncan wrote:
>
> If you're doing any snapshotting, you almost certainly want noatime, not
> the default relatime. Even without snapshotting and regardless of the
> filesystem, tho on btrfs it's a bigger factor due to COW, noatime is a
> recommen
Leonidas Spyropoulos posted on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 19:30:47 +0100 as
excerpted:
> Hello,
>
> I got a raid1 setup of btrfs on a HDD array of 2 disks. The fstab has
> the following mount settings:
> # cat /etc/fstab | grep raid1
> UUID=c9db91e6-0ba8-4ae6-b471-8fd4ff7ee72d /media/raid1 btrfs
> rw
