Zygo Blaxell posted on Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:39:27 -0400 as excerpted:
> As others have pointed out, the raid0 allocator has a 2-disk-minimum
> constraint, so any difference in size between the largest and
> second-largest disk is unusable. In your case that's 73% of the raw
> space.
>
> If the
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 05:08:17AM +, Duncan wrote:
> Carmine Paolino posted on Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:21:49 +0200 as excerpted:
>
> > I have an home server with 3 hard drives that I added to the same btrfs
> > filesystem. Several hours ago I run `btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid0
> > /` and
Hugo Mills posted on Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:13:25 + as excerpted:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 05:08:17AM +, Duncan wrote:
>> Carmine Paolino posted on Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:21:49 +0200 as excerpted:
>>
>> > I have an home server with 3 hard drives that I added to the same
>> > btrfs filesystem.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:21:49PM +0200, Carmine Paolino wrote:
> I have an home server with 3 hard drives that I added to the same btrfs
> filesystem. Several hours ago I run `btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid0
> /` and as soon as I run `btrfs fi show /` I lost my ssh connection to
> the
On 2015-10-14 05:13, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 05:08:17AM +, Duncan wrote:
Carmine Paolino posted on Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:21:49 +0200 as excerpted:
I have an home server with 3 hard drives that I added to the same btrfs
filesystem. Several hours ago I run `btrfs balance
Carmine Paolino posted on Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:21:49 +0200 as excerpted:
> I have an home server with 3 hard drives that I added to the same btrfs
> filesystem. Several hours ago I run `btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid0
> /` and as soon as I run `btrfs fi show /` I lost my ssh connection to
>
