Re: btrfs stability

2016-05-26 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Fri, 27 May 2016 00:42:07 +0200 Diego Torres wrote: > Btrfs is the only fs that can add drives one by one to an existing raid > setup, and use the new space inmediately, without replacing all the drives. Ext4, XFS, JFS or pretty much any FS which can be resized

Re: btrfs stability

2013-01-28 Thread Josef Bacik
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:27:11PM -0700, Andrew McNabb wrote: Here's an update. I tried the new kernel, and I seem to be having some new (possibly worse problems. In my ssh session, I'm seeing many errors of this sort: Message from syslogd@guru at Jan 26 13:13:14 ... kernel:[

Re: btrfs stability

2013-01-28 Thread Josef Bacik
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:27:11PM -0700, Andrew McNabb wrote: Here's an update. I tried the new kernel, and I seem to be having some new (possibly worse problems. In my ssh session, I'm seeing many errors of this sort: Message from syslogd@guru at Jan 26 13:13:14 ... kernel:[

Re: btrfs stability

2013-01-26 Thread Andrew McNabb
Here's an update. I tried the new kernel, and I seem to be having some new (possibly worse problems. In my ssh session, I'm seeing many errors of this sort: Message from syslogd@guru at Jan 26 13:13:14 ... kernel:[ 308.223834] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [btrfs-endio-wri:2073]

Re: btrfs stability

2013-01-25 Thread Josef Bacik
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:05:14PM -0700, Andrew McNabb wrote: I tried creating a multi-device btrfs filesystem for the first time (on Fedora 18 with 3.7.2-204.fc18.x86_64), and I ran into some problems. I had heard that btrfs is now reasonably stable, and though I expected to possibly see a

Re: btrfs stability

2013-01-25 Thread Josef Bacik
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:05:14PM -0700, Andrew McNabb wrote: I tried creating a multi-device btrfs filesystem for the first time (on Fedora 18 with 3.7.2-204.fc18.x86_64), and I ran into some problems. I had heard that btrfs is now reasonably stable, and though I expected to possibly see a

Re: btrfs stability

2013-01-25 Thread Andrew McNabb
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:37:17PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903794 This one is just a allocator warning because the relocator doesn't do the right accounting for relocation. It's just complainig, we need to fix it but it won't keep it from

Re: btrfs stability

2013-01-25 Thread Andrew McNabb
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:53:22PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: Actually for this one, how did you remove the disk? Did you just yank it out while the box was running? Did you mount -o degraded and then delete the device and then remove it? How exactly did you get to this situation.