Thank you, I don't think of a devices scan.
After all, I wonder why. Return codes must be
coherent so that we can know good from no-good
by them. In this spec, it's very hard to make
shell scripts with btrfsctl. If there isn't good
reason, we need to fix it, I think.
(2009/12/25 18:25), Goffredo
On Friday 25 December 2009, TARUISI Hiroaki wrote:
> I also want to know why this conversion is needed.
> This might be a typo, I think.
>
> Could someone tell us why?
> Can we fix this conversion? Or shouldn't we fix it
> considering back-compatibility?
>
It is even worse: the result code retur
I also want to know why this conversion is needed.
This might be a typo, I think.
Could someone tell us why?
Can we fix this conversion? Or shouldn't we fix it
considering back-compatibility?
Regards,
taruisi
(2009/11/11 15:16), Gong, Zhipeng wrote:
> We'd like to use btrfsctl in a shell script,
