Re: evidence of persistent state, despite device disconnects

2016-01-05 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > If however you mounted it degraded,rw at some point, then I'd say the bug > is in wetware, as in that case, based on my understanding, it's working > as intended. I was inclined to believe that was what happened based on > t

Re: evidence of persistent state, despite device disconnects

2016-01-05 Thread Duncan
Chris Murphy posted on Sun, 03 Jan 2016 14:33:40 -0700 as excerpted: > kernel-4.4.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc24.x86_64 btrfs-progs 4.3.1 > > There was some copy pasting, hence /mnt/brick vs /mnt/brick2 confusion, > but the volume was always cleanly mounted and umounted. > > The biggest problem I have with

Re: evidence of persistent state, despite device disconnects

2016-01-03 Thread Chris Murphy
kernel-4.4.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc24.x86_64 btrfs-progs 4.3.1 There was some copy pasting, hence /mnt/brick vs /mnt/brick2 confusion, but the volume was always cleanly mounted and umounted. The biggest problem I have with all of this is the completely silent addition of single chunks. That made the vol

Re: evidence of persistent state, despite device disconnects

2016-01-03 Thread Duncan
Chris Murphy posted on Sat, 02 Jan 2016 12:22:07 -0700 as excerpted: > OK, I basically do not trust the f'n kernel anymore. I'm having to > reboot in order to get to a (reasonably) deterministic state. Merely > disconnecting devices doesn't make all aspects of that device and its > filesystem, va