Re: tree root

2012-10-04 Thread David Sterba
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:35:00PM +0200, Øystein Sættem Middelthun wrote: > Well block 14102764707840 seems great, but generation doesn't match, > have=109268, want=109269 > > Because the filesystem was last in use with a pre 3.2-kernel I am unable to > use mount -o recovery, but restore seems to

Re: tree root

2012-10-03 Thread Mitch Harder
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Øystein Sættem Middelthun wrote: > On 10/03/2012 07:29 PM, Mitch Harder wrote: >> >> If you do not have a suitable backup for these files, please make an >> effort to do what you can with restore. Some of the repair methods >> out there have a possibility to make t

Re: tree root

2012-10-03 Thread Øystein Sættem Middelthun
On 10/03/2012 07:29 PM, Mitch Harder wrote: If you do not have a suitable backup for these files, please make an effort to do what you can with restore. Some of the repair methods out there have a possibility to make the situation worse. We are talking about something like 50TB, so there is ju

Re: tree root

2012-10-03 Thread Mitch Harder
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Øystein Sættem Middelthun wrote: > Hi! > > I have a broken btrfs unable to mount because it is unable to find the tree > root. Using find-root I find the following: > > Well block 14102764707840 seems great, but generation doesn't match, > have=109268, want=109269