On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 19:45, Hugo Mills wrote:
>
>It would be really great if there was an ioctl that allowed you to
> say things like "take the chunks of this block group and put them on
> devices 2, 4 and 5 in RAID-5", because you could do a load of
> optimisation with reshaping the FS in u
Le 19 juin 2019 05:27:21 Andrei Borzenkov a écrit :
18.06.2019 21:45, Hugo Mills пишет:
...
Is there a way to ask the block group allocator to prefer writing to
a specific device during a balance? Something like -ddestdevid=N?
This would just be a hint to the allocator and the usual const
18.06.2019 21:45, Hugo Mills пишет:
...
>
>> Is there a way to ask the block group allocator to prefer writing to
>> a specific device during a balance? Something like -ddestdevid=N?
>> This would just be a hint to the allocator and the usual constraints
>> would always apply (and prevail over the
June 18, 2019 9:42 PM, "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" wrote:
> On 2019-06-18 15:37, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
>
>> June 18, 2019 9:06 PM, "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" wrote:
>> On 2019-06-18 14:26, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> I don't need to have a perfectly balanced FS, I just want all the spac
On 2019-06-18 15:37, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
June 18, 2019 9:06 PM, "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" wrote:
On 2019-06-18 14:26, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
[...]
I don't need to have a perfectly balanced FS, I just want all the space > to be
allocatable.
I tried using the -ddevid option but it only i
June 18, 2019 9:06 PM, "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" wrote:
> On 2019-06-18 14:26, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I don't need to have a perfectly balanced FS, I just want all the space > to
>> be allocatable.
>> I tried using the -ddevid option but it only instructs btrfs to work on >
>> th
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 07:14:26PM +, DO NOT USE wrote:
> June 18, 2019 8:45 PM, "Hugo Mills" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 08:26:32PM +0200, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> I tried using the -ddevid option but it only instructs btrfs to work
> >> on the block groups allocated
June 18, 2019 8:45 PM, "Hugo Mills" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 08:26:32PM +0200, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
>> [...]
>> Of course the solution is to run a balance, but as the filesystem is
>> now quite big, I'd like to avoid running a full rebalance. This
>> would be quite i/o intensive, woul
On 2019-06-18 14:26, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
Hello,
I've been a btrfs user for quite a number of years now, but it seems I
need the wiseness of the btrfs gurus on this one!
I have a 5-hdd btrfs raid1 setup with 4x3T+1x10T drives.
A few days ago, I replaced one of the 3T by a new 10T, running
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:58 PM Austin S. Hemmelgarn
wrote:
>
> On 2019-06-18 14:57, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 02:50:34PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> >> On 2019-06-18 14:45, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 08:26:32PM +0200, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
> >
On 2019-06-18 14:57, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 02:50:34PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2019-06-18 14:45, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 08:26:32PM +0200, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
I've been a btrfs user for quite a number of years now, but it seems
I need the
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:50 PM Austin S. Hemmelgarn
wrote:
>
> On 2019-06-18 14:45, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > -dlimit=100 will only move 100 GiB of data (i.e. 200 GiB), so it'll
> > be a pretty limited change. You'll need to use a larger number than
> > that if you want it to have a significant
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 02:50:34PM -0400, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2019-06-18 14:45, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 08:26:32PM +0200, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
> >>I've been a btrfs user for quite a number of years now, but it seems
> >>I need the wiseness of the btrfs gurus on
On 2019-06-18 14:45, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 08:26:32PM +0200, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
I've been a btrfs user for quite a number of years now, but it seems
I need the wiseness of the btrfs gurus on this one!
I have a 5-hdd btrfs raid1 setup with 4x3T+1x10T drives.
A few days
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 08:26:32PM +0200, Stéphane Lesimple wrote:
> I've been a btrfs user for quite a number of years now, but it seems
> I need the wiseness of the btrfs gurus on this one!
>
> I have a 5-hdd btrfs raid1 setup with 4x3T+1x10T drives.
> A few days ago, I replaced one of the 3T by
Hello,
I've been a btrfs user for quite a number of years now, but it seems I need
the wiseness of the btrfs gurus on this one!
I have a 5-hdd btrfs raid1 setup with 4x3T+1x10T drives.
A few days ago, I replaced one of the 3T by a new 10T, running btrfs
replace and then resizing the FS to use
16 matches
Mail list logo
