On May 14, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Vincent wrote:
> Why is it more easier to extend a Brfs partition rather than to reduce it,
> while the single raid is supposed to be made for that?
Are you referring to normal operation or your degraded case? In normal
operation, yes you can reduce it within th
On May 13, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Vincent wrote:
> Shit, I've followed the official documentation
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices#Replacing_failed_devices
>
> With, as explain:
> mkfs.btrfs -d single /dev/sda3 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1
You did this o
Shit, I've followed the official documentation
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices#Replacing_failed_devices
With, as explain:
mkfs.btrfs -d single /dev/sda3 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1
mount -o degraded /dev/sda3 /media/single-raid/
btrfs device delete mi
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Vincent wrote:
> Le 13/05/2013 16:29, Harald Glatt a écrit :
>
>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Vincent wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am on Ubuntu Server 13.04 with Linux 3.8.
>>>
>>> I've created a "single-raid" using /dev/sd{a,b,c,d}{1,3}. One of my hard
>>
Le 13/05/2013 16:29, Harald Glatt a écrit :
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Vincent wrote:
Hello,
I am on Ubuntu Server 13.04 with Linux 3.8.
I've created a "single-raid" using /dev/sd{a,b,c,d}{1,3}. One of my hard
drives has failed, I mean it's materially dead.
:~$ sudo btrfs filesystem sh
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Vincent wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am on Ubuntu Server 13.04 with Linux 3.8.
>
> I've created a "single-raid" using /dev/sd{a,b,c,d}{1,3}. One of my hard
> drives has failed, I mean it's materially dead.
>
> :~$ sudo btrfs filesystem show
> Label: none uuid: 40886f51-8
Hello,
I am on Ubuntu Server 13.04 with Linux 3.8.
I've created a "single-raid" using /dev/sd{a,b,c,d}{1,3}. One of my hard
drives has failed, I mean it's materially dead.
:~$ sudo btrfs filesystem show
Label: none uuid: 40886f51-8c9b-4be1-8721-83bf5653d2a0
Total devices 5 FS bytes used