On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Evert Vorster wrote:
> Hi there...
>
> I'm not an expert. however, since you don't care about the data on
> the SSD anymore, reformat it, and fill it up, then verify what you
> have written.
>
> However, if the capacity has changed, would that not be enough rea
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:07:47PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>
>> the mayhem starts with:
>>
>> "Oct 8 02:38:26 (none) kernel: btrfs bad tree block start 24630358016
>> 24630292480"
>
> Ok, so the drive has decided to jumble up our bloc
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:07:47PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> well after recently talking about how i haven't had any problems with
> btrfs on several machines for ~1.5yrs...
>
> it happens :-(
>
> ) 2.6.35 kernel
> ) btrfs on partition 2 of sda
> ) no special mkfs or mount options used (
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > can anyone point me in the right direction? it looks like maybe
> > the SSD is failing to me (all the "slow link" and "capacity
> > changed to 0" stuff), but i really don't know. i knew there was
> > a reason they were sellin
Hi,
> can anyone point me in the right direction? it looks like maybe
> the SSD is failing to me (all the "slow link" and "capacity
> changed to 0" stuff), but i really don't know. i knew there was
> a reason they were selling these things cheap on Newegg!!!
Yes, the read errors are
