Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
As Chris mentioned, try a later version. If you are familiar
with git, you could even try the devel version.
Looking at the commits in current devel (2f4a73f9a612876116) since
v4.9, there doesn't seem to be anything relevant, but I can retry,
if you think it's worth.
Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Christoph Groth
wrote:
Any ideas on what could be done? If you need help to debug the
problem with
btrfs-image, please tell me what I should do. I can keep the
broken file
system around until an image can be created at some later time.
On 01/17/2017 02:25 PM, Christoph Groth wrote:
> Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>> On 01/17/2017 02:44 AM, Christoph Groth wrote:
>>> Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>>>
Would you be able to upload a btrfs-image for me to examine. This is a
core ctree error where most probably item size is incorrect
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Christoph Groth
wrote:
> Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>>
>> On 01/17/2017 02:44 AM, Christoph Groth wrote:
>>>
>>> Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>>>
Would you be able to upload a btrfs-image for me to examine. This is a
core ctree error where most probably item si
Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
On 01/17/2017 02:44 AM, Christoph Groth wrote:
Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
Would you be able to upload a btrfs-image for me to
examine. This is a
core ctree error where most probably item size is incorrectly
registered.
Sure, I can do that. I'd like to use the -s opti
On 2017-01-17 04:18, Christoph Groth wrote:
Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
There's not really much in the way of great documentation that I know
of. I can however cover the basics here:
(...)
Thanks for this explanation. I'm sure it will be also useful to others.
Glad I could help.
If the
On 2017-01-16 23:50, Janos Toth F. wrote:
BTRFS uses a 2 level allocation system. At the higher level, you have
chunks. These are just big blocks of space on the disk that get used for
only one type of lower level allocation (Data, Metadata, or System). Data
chunks are normally 1GB, Metadata 2
On 01/17/2017 02:44 AM, Christoph Groth wrote:
> Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
>
>> Would you be able to upload a btrfs-image for me to examine. This is a
>> core ctree error where most probably item size is incorrectly registered.
>
> Sure, I can do that. I'd like to use the -s option, will this b
Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
There's not really much in the way of great documentation that I
know of. I can however cover the basics here:
(...)
Thanks for this explanation. I'm sure it will be also useful to
others.
If the chunk to be allocated was a data chunk, you get -ENOSPC
(usual
Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
Would you be able to upload a btrfs-image for me to
examine. This is a core ctree error where most probably item
size is incorrectly registered.
Sure, I can do that. I'd like to use the -s option, will this be
fine? Is there some preferred place for the upload? If
> BTRFS uses a 2 level allocation system. At the higher level, you have
> chunks. These are just big blocks of space on the disk that get used for
> only one type of lower level allocation (Data, Metadata, or System). Data
> chunks are normally 1GB, Metadata 256MB, and System depends on the size
On 01/16/2017 05:10 AM, Christoph Groth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been using a btrfs RAID1 of two hard disks since early 2012 on my
> home server. The machine has been working well overall, but recently
> some problems with the file system surfaced. Since I do have backups, I
> do not worry about
On 2017-01-16 10:42, Christoph Groth wrote:
Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2017-01-16 06:10, Christoph Groth wrote:
root@mim:~# btrfs fi df /
Data, RAID1: total=417.00GiB, used=344.62GiB
Data, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00B
System, RAID1: total=40.00MiB, used=68.00KiB
System, single: total
Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2017-01-16 06:10, Christoph Groth wrote:
root@mim:~# btrfs fi df /
Data, RAID1: total=417.00GiB, used=344.62GiB
Data, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00B
System, RAID1: total=40.00MiB, used=68.00KiB
System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00B
Metadata, RAID1: total=3
On 2017-01-16 06:10, Christoph Groth wrote:
Hi,
I’ve been using a btrfs RAID1 of two hard disks since early 2012 on my
home server. The machine has been working well overall, but recently
some problems with the file system surfaced. Since I do have backups, I
do not worry about the data, but I
Hi,
I’ve been using a btrfs RAID1 of two hard disks since early 2012
on my home server. The machine has been working well overall, but
recently some problems with the file system surfaced. Since I do
have backups, I do not worry about the data, but I post here to
better understand what happ
16 matches
Mail list logo
