Hello,
I just updated and pushed btrfs-next, if it is missing something let me
know. I had to kick out the printk formatting patch because it didn't
compile and I didn't take Miao's background enospc flushing stuff since
some of it didn't apply and 5/5 hasn't been updated to force waiting on
Josef,
> I just updated and pushed btrfs-next, if it is missing something let me
> know.
below two patches are missing, should it be re-based? let me know.
[PATCH v2] btrfs: add framework to read fs info from btrfs-control
btrfs-progs side of the patch is:
[PATCH v4 1/3] btrfs-progs
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 02:15:11PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> I just updated and pushed btrfs-next, if it is missing something let me
> know. I had to kick out the printk formatting patch because it didn't
> compile and I didn't take Miao's background enospc flushing stuff since some
> of it didn
Quoting David Sterba (2013-12-12 08:08:38)
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 02:15:11PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > I just updated and pushed btrfs-next, if it is missing something let me
> > know. I had to kick out the printk formatting patch because it didn't
> > compile and I didn't take Miao's backg
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 02:15:11PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> I just updated and pushed btrfs-next, if it is missing something let me
> know. I had to kick out the printk formatting patch because it didn't
> compile and I didn't take Miao's background enospc flushing stuff since some
> of it didn
Josef,
I've rebased my printk patches against btrfs-next master and compile
and run tested it. See
[PATCH v4] Btrfs: convert printk to btrfs_ and fix BTRFS prefix
thanks
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just updated and pushed btrfs-next, if it is missing some
