On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 02:23:12PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
In fact, it's not a regression.
The 013 testcase is a special case that uses a script to corrupt the
image and then do the btrfsck test.
There is a patch before the commit, to allow btrfs-progs test script
call corruption
On 19 December 2014 at 13:48, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 02:23:12PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
In fact, it's not a regression.
The 013 testcase is a special case that uses a script to corrupt the
image and then do the btrfsck test.
There is a patch before the
Hi guys,
The latest integration fails 'make test' with the following output:
[TEST]013-leaf-corruption-no-extent-data.tar.xz
btrfs check should have detected corruption
Makefile:144: recipe for target 'test' failed
make: *** [test] Error 1
rm btrfs-corrupt-block.o
I've only built the
On 18 December 2014 18:35:16 GMT+00:00, WorMzy Tykashi
wormzy.tyka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
The latest integration fails 'make test' with the following output:
[TEST]013-leaf-corruption-no-extent-data.tar.xz
btrfs check should have detected corruption
Makefile:144: recipe for
Original Message
Subject: Re: btrfs-progs: integration-20141218 possible corruption test
regression
From: WorMzy Tykashi wormzy.tyka...@gmail.com
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Date: 2014年12月19日 02:39
On 18 December 2014 18:35:16 GMT+00:00, WorMzy Tykashi
wormzy.tyka
