Hi Josef,
I manually made those changes to the code / applied that patch and it
compiled fine so it was definitely due to gcc 4.5
it's also quite talkative:
btrfsck /dev/mapper/portage
found 1596116992 bytes used err is 0
total csum bytes: 1296728
total tree bytes: 268267520
total fs tree bytes:
Hi Zhu,
it's gcc 4.5.1:
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.5.1/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1/work/gcc-4.5.1/configure
--prefix
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 01:10:20PM +0200, Mat wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> when trying to compile btrfs-progs from the unstable repo
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git)
> via the live-ebuild (on Gentoo)
>
> it keeps on failing for me no matter what (sane) CFL
56:48 +0800
> From: Zhu Yanhai
> To: Mat
> Cc: chris.ma...@oracle.com, Josef Bacik ,
> linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: btrfs-progs (unstable) failing to compile successfully
>
> Hi Mat,
> What's the version of your gcc?
> I don't have a linux box h
Hi Mat,
What's the version of your gcc?
I don't have a linux box here at home to test, but it seems like the case
we meet in MeeGo after upgrading gcc to some new version, 4.5 maybe.
You need #include and in btrfsck.c
to fix this.
Regards,
Zhu Yanhai
2010/8/28 Mat :
> Hi guys,
>
> when trying
Hi guys,
when trying to compile btrfs-progs from the unstable repo
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git)
via the live-ebuild (on Gentoo)
it keeps on failing for me no matter what (sane) CFLAGS or LDFLAGS I use:
(for reference and completeness I'll also po
