Hi,
It's not a big deal, but I've just noticed that the most recent
unstable-integration btrfs tools (built from [1]) are still reporting
their version as v0.20-rc1-638-g8e44385, rather than
v3.12-xxx-. I believe this is because the master branch in the
devel repository has not been tagged
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 03:59:48PM +, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
> It's not a big deal, but I've just noticed that the most recent
> unstable-integration btrfs tools (built from [1]) are still reporting
> their version as v0.20-rc1-638-g8e44385, rather than
> v3.12-xxx-. I believe this is be
On 11 December 2013 16:37, David Sterba wrote:
>
> Sorry, I haven't pushed the tags, fixed now. The repos are mostly
> identical to increase availability.
>
> david
Cheers for that.
WorMzy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majo
