Re: btrfs-progs license

2021-01-14 Thread Stefano Babic
Hi Neal, On 14.01.21 20:38, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 7:18 AM Stefano Babic wrote: Hi David, On 10.12.20 12:27, David Sterba wrote: On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 01:00:01PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:49:10AM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote: Hi, I hope I a

Re: btrfs-progs license

2021-01-14 Thread Stefano Babic
Hi David, On 14.01.21 19:47, David Sterba wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 01:03:04PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote: I read this, thanks. I was quite confused about the license for libbtrfsutil due to both "COPYING" and "COPYING.LESSER" in the library path. COPYING reports GPLv3. But headers in fil

Re: btrfs-progs license

2021-01-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 7:18 AM Stefano Babic wrote: > > Hi David, > > On 10.12.20 12:27, David Sterba wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 01:00:01PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:49:10AM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I hope I am not OT. I ask about

Re: btrfs-progs license

2021-01-14 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 01:03:04PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote: > I read this, thanks. > > I was quite confused about the license for libbtrfsutil due to both > "COPYING" and "COPYING.LESSER" in the library path. COPYING reports > GPLv3. But headers in file set LGPLv3, sure, and btrfs.h is GPLv2. >