On 21/03/2014 00:55, Chris Mason wrote:
On 03/20/2014 07:36 PM, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
On 25 November 2013 21:45, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
I don't know if there wasn't enough commits to justify a 3.13 release
(I noticed your integration branch stalled 7 weeks ago, so I
On 25 November 2013 21:45, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've tagged the current btrfs-progs repo as v3.12. The new idea is that
instead of making the poor distros pull from git, I'll be creating
tagged releases at roughly the same pace as Linus cuts kernels.
On 03/20/2014 07:36 PM, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
On 25 November 2013 21:45, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've tagged the current btrfs-progs repo as v3.12. The new idea is that
instead of making the poor distros pull from git, I'll be creating
tagged releases at
On 20 March 2014 23:55, Chris Mason c...@fb.com wrote:
On 03/20/2014 07:36 PM, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
On 25 November 2013 21:45, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've tagged the current btrfs-progs repo as v3.12. The new idea is that
instead of making the poor
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've tagged the current btrfs-progs repo as v3.12. The new idea is that
instead of making the poor distros pull from git, I'll be creating
tagged releases at roughly the same pace as Linus cuts
On 11/25/13, 3:45 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've tagged the current btrfs-progs repo as v3.12. The new idea is that
instead of making the poor distros pull from git, I'll be creating
tagged releases at roughly the same pace as Linus cuts kernels.
Given the volume of btrfs-progs
Hi everyone,
I've tagged the current btrfs-progs repo as v3.12. The new idea is that
instead of making the poor distros pull from git, I'll be creating
tagged releases at roughly the same pace as Linus cuts kernels.
Given the volume of btrfs-progs patches, we should have enough new code
and
I'm humbly totally unqualified to comment but that sounds like an
excellent idea. Thanks.
I can't say for others but I was put off by the 0.19 forever eternal
version which pushed me to investigate GIT... I'm sure that has been
putting off many people including distro assemblers.
Just for some
