On Tue, 20 May 2014 18:26:59 -0600
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
That ought to be true, but at least on a systemd 212-4 system, it
assumes the system root needs to be fsck'd before mounting it. Since
the fs isn't mounted, fstab isn't available. And the fstab.empty file
I found
On May 21, 2014, at 4:47 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2014 18:26:59 -0600
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
That ought to be true, but at least on a systemd 212-4 system, it
assumes the system root needs to be fsck'd before mounting it. Since
the fs
Should the initrd/initramfs no longer include btrfsck, and instead include
btrfs and fsck.btrfs?
In btrfs-progs 3.14 there is now a 1K /sbin/fsck.btrfs placeholder file.
btrfs and btrfsck files are the same binary, the difference is btrfsck only can
do check/repair. Including btrfs instead
Chris Murphy posted on Tue, 20 May 2014 10:56:26 -0600 as excerpted:
Should the initrd/initramfs no longer include btrfsck, and instead
include btrfs and fsck.btrfs?
btrfs (the program) should be included in any case as btrfs device scan
should be run (normally triggered via udev rules when a
On May 20, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Chris Murphy posted on Tue, 20 May 2014 10:56:26 -0600 as excerpted:
Should the initrd/initramfs no longer include btrfsck, and instead
include btrfs and fsck.btrfs?
btrfs (the program) should be included in any case as
