On 2021/3/8 下午6:02, chil L1n wrote:
Hi Qu,
Thanks for some explanation.
Personally, I prefer binary to compare bit-level changes.
Actually, I also miscounted. I count 3 bit flips.
Yes, you're right, xor also returns 3 bits flips.
But the point is not about directly comparing the two key of
Hi Qu,
Thanks for some explanation.
Personally, I prefer binary to compare bit-level changes.
Actually, I also miscounted. I count 3 bit flips. Isn't that extremely
unlikely, assuming that each bit flip is independent?
Nonetheless, I'm running another RAM test with memtester and 6GB RAM
blocks
On 2021/3/8 下午5:23, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/3/8 下午4:56, chil L1n wrote:
Hi Johannes,
Thanks for the advice. I'm running memtester now. This will take some
time as the machine has 32GB RAM.
Regarding your explanation, I count two bit position differences, not
1. Can you explain your reason
On 2021/3/8 下午5:23, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/3/8 下午4:56, chil L1n wrote:
Hi Johannes,
Thanks for the advice. I'm running memtester now. This will take some
time as the machine has 32GB RAM.
Regarding your explanation, I count two bit position differences, not
1. Can you explain your reason
On 2021/3/8 下午4:56, chil L1n wrote:
Hi Johannes,
Thanks for the advice. I'm running memtester now. This will take some
time as the machine has 32GB RAM.
Regarding your explanation, I count two bit position differences, not
1. Can you explain your reasoning?
It looks like Johannes missed one
Hi Johannes,
Thanks for the advice. I'm running memtester now. This will take some
time as the machine has 32GB RAM.
Regarding your explanation, I count two bit position differences, not
1. Can you explain your reasoning?
Thanks,
chill
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 9:41 AM Johannes Thumshirn
wrote:
On 06/03/2021 10:11, chil L1n wrote:
> [211.868642] BTRFS critical (device sda4): corrupt leaf: root=258
> block=250975895552 slot=78, bad key order, prev (256703 108 3276800)
> current (256703 108 1310720)
> [211.868650] BTRFS error (device sda4): block=250975895552 write
> time tree block
Hi,
Just noticed that one of my btrfs mounts on a server was in read-only mode.
dmesg shows:
[2217355.427810] BTRFS info (device sda3): scrub: started on devid 1
[2221262.216646] BTRFS info (device sda3): scrub: finished on devid 1
with status: 0
[2390153.679168] BTRFS info (device sda4): scrub: