On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:46:14 am Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> Sorry, I don't understand what "backport the changes" means?
Chris means that you can take the changes that have gone into
the btrfs code since 2.6.32 and try and port them back to the
old 2.6.32 kernel code. It's a non-trivial task.
I think that means that the fixes in the newer versions will also be
included in the previous versions.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:45:59PM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:45:59PM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Chri
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:45:59PM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Chris Mason
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:45
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
wrote:
> My question though is, if I use experimental kernels can I then load
> an "old" kernel and still use the btrfs filesystem?
> Or the newer kernels write anything specials on ionodes which the old
> ones cannot read?
My understanding i
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:45:19PM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, cwil
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:45:19PM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, cwillu wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Leonida
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:45:19PM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, cwillu wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
>> > wrote:
>> >> The above command is not working on my system
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:45:19PM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, cwillu wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
> > wrote:
> >> The above command is not working on my system.
> >> Information:
> >> btrfs f df /media/data
> >
> > btr
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, cwillu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
> wrote:
>> The above command is not working on my system.
>> Information:
>> btrfs f df /media/data
>
> btrfs f isn't unique; fi is the minimum to specify "filesystem"
>
I tried even with btrf
The above command is not working on my system.
Information:
btrfs f df /media/data
Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd
Linux woofy 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Sep 17 21:50:19 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
mount info:
/dev/sdd2 on /media/data type btrfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
/media/data is a raid 0 filesystem
11 matches
Mail list logo