I'm not asking for a specific endorsement, but should I be considering
something like the seagate ironwolf or WD red drives?
You need two qualitative features from HDD for RAID usage:
1) being failfast (TLER in WD talk), and
2) be designed to tolerate vibrations from other disks in a box.
There
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Bill Williamson wrote:
> btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
I only found this:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg62382.html
I can't tell if it's related though.
I'd include the results from btrfs check and btrfs check
--mode=lowmem, using btrfs-progs
Bill Williamson posted on Sun, 28 May 2017 17:27:47 +1000 as excerpted:
> I'm not asking for a specific endorsement, but should I be considering
> something like the seagate ironwolf or WD red drives?
There's a (well, at least one) guy here that knows much more about that
than I do, and FWIW, my
On 28 May 2017 at 15:56, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Bill Williamson posted on Sun, 28 May 2017 12:46:00 +1000 as excerpted:
>
>> At first I got the failed to read log tree error, so I ran
>> btrfs-zero-log. It walked back 3-4 transactions but now seems okay.
>>
>> After that fix:
>> -
Bill Williamson posted on Sun, 28 May 2017 12:46:00 +1000 as excerpted:
> Version details:
> btrfs-progs v4.9.1
> Linux bigserver 4.10.0-22-generic #24-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 22
> 17:43:20 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> Array Details:
> root@bigserver:~# btrfs fi df /mnt/storage
> Data,
Version details:
btrfs-progs v4.9.1
Linux bigserver 4.10.0-22-generic #24-Ubuntu SMP Mon May 22 17:43:20
UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Array Details:
root@bigserver:~# btrfs fi df /mnt/storage
Data, RAID1: total=12.48TiB, used=12.25TiB
System, RAID1: total=32.00MiB, used=2.11MiB
Metadata
