Marc MERLIN posted on Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:24:20 -0700 as excerpted:
>> If instead of using a single BTRFS filesystem you used LVM volumes
>> (maybe with Thin provisioning and monitoring of the volume group free
>> space) for each of your servers to backup with one BTRFS filesystem per
>> volume yo
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Lionel Bouton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29/06/2018 09:22, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:09:54PM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> >> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 23:59:03 -0700
> >> Marc MERLIN wrote:
> >>
> >>> I don't waste a week recreating the many b
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:30:26PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:44:16PM +, Martin wrote:
> >> OK... So for backing up across a local network to a second physical host...
> >>
> >> Is btrfs-send-receive stable
On Dec 13, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:44:16PM +, Martin wrote:
>> OK... So for backing up across a local network to a second physical host...
>>
>> Is btrfs-send-receive stable enough now to be used?
>
> It seems to be OK for me at the moment -- I'm
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:44:16PM +, Martin wrote:
> OK... So for backing up across a local network to a second physical host...
>
> Is btrfs-send-receive stable enough now to be used?
It seems to be OK for me at the moment -- I'm not running it across
a network (yet), but I am using it b
OK... So for backing up across a local network to a second physical host...
Is btrfs-send-receive stable enough now to be used?
How does send-receive compare to using rsync for backups?
Any comments please from those using such things?
Thanks,
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
