Re: btrfsctl -A not returning useful information

On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 20:28 +0300, Ahmed Kamal wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdb > ioctl returns 0 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdc > ioctl returns 0 > > > /dev/sdb has a btrfs, while /dev/sdc is blank. What's that output > supposed to mean

Re: btrfsctl -A not returning useful information

Ahmed Kamal wrote: Thanks Linda, I located the kernel message. Is it normal such issues are not tracked in the project's bugzilla: http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Btrfs which only contains 5 bugs ?! I suppose it depends on whether its a bug with something that's supposed to w

Re: btrfsctl -A not returning useful information

Thanks Linda, I located the kernel message. Is it normal such issues are not tracked in the project's bugzilla: http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Btrfs which only contains 5 bugs ?! On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Linda Knippers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ahmed Kamal wrote: >>

Re: btrfsctl -A not returning useful information

Ahmed Kamal wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdb ioctl returns 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdc ioctl returns 0 /dev/sdb has a btrfs, while /dev/sdc is blank. What's that output supposed to mean ? Is it a bug ? I think not so much of a bug as

btrfsctl -A not returning useful information

[EMAIL PROTECTED] progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdb ioctl returns 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdc ioctl returns 0 /dev/sdb has a btrfs, while /dev/sdc is blank. What's that output supposed to mean ? Is it a bug ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub