Re: delayed inodes implementation questions

2017-09-29 Thread David Sterba
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 04:00:29PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > On 2017年09月29日 15:15, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > I've been studying the implementation of the delayed inodes feature and > > have a couple of questions. > > Sorry I can't answer your question, but as you may already know by the >

Re: delayed inodes implementation questions

2017-09-29 Thread Nikolay Borisov
On 29.09.2017 11:00, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > On 2017年09月29日 15:15, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> I've been studying the implementation of the delayed inodes feature and >> have a couple of questions. > > Sorry I can't answer your question, but as you may already know by the >

Re: delayed inodes implementation questions

2017-09-29 Thread Qu Wenruo
On 2017年09月29日 15:15, Nikolay Borisov wrote: Hello, I've been studying the implementation of the delayed inodes feature and have a couple of questions. Sorry I can't answer your question, but as you may already know by the rejection mail, Miao Xie has left Fujitsu and has been for several

delayed inodes implementation questions

2017-09-29 Thread Nikolay Borisov
Hello, I've been studying the implementation of the delayed inodes feature and have a couple of questions. 1. Why are there 2 lists when each and every node is on both lists at the same time? So if we happen to be running the async worker we are processing nodes based on the prepared_list, at