On Tuesday 06 January 2009 04:10:42 Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 03:37:33 Chris Mason wrote:
> > So, long term we can have a benchmarking contest, but I've got a little
> > ways to go before that is a good idea.
>
> That would be good.
This got me motivated to rebase fsblock to
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 03:37:33 Chris Mason wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 01:39 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > [trim ccs]
> >
> > Feel free to ignore this diversion ;) I'd like to see btrfs go upstream
> > sooner rather than later. But eventually we'll have to resurrect fsblock
> > vs extent ma
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 01:39 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> [trim ccs]
>
> Feel free to ignore this diversion ;) I'd like to see btrfs go upstream
> sooner rather than later. But eventually we'll have to resurrect fsblock
> vs extent map discussion.
>
There's extent_map, extent_state and extent_buff
[trim ccs]
Feel free to ignore this diversion ;) I'd like to see btrfs go upstream
sooner rather than later. But eventually we'll have to resurrect fsblock
vs extent map discussion.
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 00:21:43 Chris Mason wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 21:32 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
