On 08/01/2014 05:05 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Looks like you missed Miao update (on 17 Jul) to back out the bad
> patch (below), and your integration branch (published on 25 Jul)
> still contains the same.
>
> [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: fix wrong total device counter after removing a
Hi Chris,
Looks like you missed Miao update (on 17 Jul) to back out the bad
patch (below), and your integration branch (published on 25 Jul)
still contains the same.
[PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: fix wrong total device counter after removing a seed
device
You should remove it.
Simple test cases
On 07/24/2014 10:16 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi chris,
>
> It seems that two of my wrong patches got merged in integration branch:
> 6068d17c8ab5bce946e9678ed2064e9f966cbe62 btrfs: Merge default subvolume
> mount codes into btrfs_mount_subvol().
> 8a2166332e332541f13b34b7248c0f14f575731e btrfs: Call
option is given.
These two patches does not completely work, and the successor patch is
under review.(the show_path one)
If it is OK for you, please remove these two patches.
Thanks,
Qu
Original Message
Subject: integration tree updated
From: Chris Mason
To: linux-btrfs
D
Hi everyone,
I've pushed out my current integration branch. It does have a few of
Miao Xie's patches missing because there were some rejects. I think
this was just because some things got pulled in out of order, and I'll
get it fixed up.
Also missing is Mark's quota snapshot deletion fixes. Th
