Re: kernel BUG: kernel bug caught at 55% mark of portage cache update

2008-12-19 Thread Julian Andres Klode
2008/12/19 Chris Mason : > On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 14:57 -0500, Thomas Harning wrote: >> A kernel 'BUG' was caught while I had compression enabled and was >> performing a 'portage' update on my gentoo installation (which had >> btrfs mounted for portage for some basic perf testing). It has >> finish

Re: kernel BUG: kernel bug caught at 55% mark of portage cache update

2008-12-19 Thread Chris Mason
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 17:24 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > 2008/12/19 Chris Mason : > > On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 14:57 -0500, Thomas Harning wrote: > >> A kernel 'BUG' was caught while I had compression enabled and was > >> performing a 'portage' update on my gentoo installation (which had > >> b

Re: kernel BUG: kernel bug caught at 55% mark of portage cache update

2008-12-19 Thread Chris Mason
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 14:57 -0500, Thomas Harning wrote: > A kernel 'BUG' was caught while I had compression enabled and was > performing a 'portage' update on my gentoo installation (which had > btrfs mounted for portage for some basic perf testing). It has > finished the rsync and was at t

kernel BUG: kernel bug caught at 55% mark of portage cache update

2008-12-16 Thread Thomas Harning
A kernel 'BUG' was caught while I had compression enabled and was performing a 'portage' update on my gentoo installation (which had btrfs mounted for portage for some basic perf testing). It has finished the rsync and was at the 55% mark of the portage cache update... if that helps at all