Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2260!

2011-06-09 Thread James Cloos
> "DS" == David Sterba writes: DS> confirmed, -ENOSPC == -28 So not a novel BUG_ON() after all. On the plus side, it has not re-appeared in the 3.0 rc's. That (4 Gig) fs currently has: :; find /usr/local/portage|wc -l 444073 :; df /usr/local/portage Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Avail

Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2260!

2011-06-09 Thread David Sterba
cess is stuck, and what locks are being held, probably with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE. but this will not help anyhow. > ----[ cut here ] > kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2260! > invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP > CPU 1 > Modules linked in: k10temp > > Pid

kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2260!

2011-05-30 Thread James Cloos
BUG_ON(). [ cut here ]---- kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2260! invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU 1 Modules linked in: k10temp Pid: 1343, comm: g-common Not tainted 2.6.39-07159-gf23a5e1 #57 MSI MS-7642/890GXM-G65 (MS-7642) RIP: 0010:[] [] btrfs_orphan_add+0xfa/0x1