Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2642!

2010-09-10 Thread Itaru Kitayama
Thank you, Zhu. Would you send the patch to Andrew or should I pass it on to him? Itaru On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:30:52 +0800 Zhu Yanhai zhu.yan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, That's because btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log() will return the real errno after Andi's commit, so btrfs_unlink_inode() has to

Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2642!

2010-09-10 Thread Zhu Yanhai
Please feel free to forward it, as I don't know the addr for -mm tree. -zyh 2010/9/10 Itaru Kitayama kitay...@cl.bb4u.ne.jp: Thank you, Zhu. Would you send the patch to Andrew or should I pass it on to him? Itaru On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:30:52 +0800 Zhu Yanhai zhu.yan...@gmail.com wrote:

kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2642!

2010-09-09 Thread Itaru Kitayama
Hi Chris, The latest mmotm on a virtual machine boots, but when I log in I get: [ 82.276418] [ cut here ] [ 82.277565] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2643! [ 82.278692] invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 82.280332] last sysfs file:

Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2642!

2010-09-09 Thread Zhu Yanhai
Hi, That's because btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log() will return the real errno after Andi's commit, so btrfs_unlink_inode() has to check the return value more seriously. A patch for this has been sent out. Regards, Zhu Yanhai 2010/9/9 Itaru Kitayama kitay...@cl.bb4u.ne.jp: Hi Chris, The latest