On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/19/13 7:11 PM, Jon Nelson wrote:
>> The following is a minor patch to cmds-restore.c
>>
>
> Hi Jon - just a note -
>
> When sending a patch like this, it's best to follow the standard
> patch form
On 4/19/13 7:11 PM, Jon Nelson wrote:
> The following is a minor patch to cmds-restore.c
>
Hi Jon - just a note -
When sending a patch like this, it's best to follow the standard
patch format, which closely mimics the kernel patch submission
guidelines:
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs-progs:
The following is a minor patch to cmds-restore.c
diff --git a/cmds-restore.c b/cmds-restore.c
index c75e187..273c813 100644
--- a/cmds-restore.c
+++ b/cmds-restore.c
@@ -917,14 +917,16 @@ out:
}
const char * const cmd_restore_usage[] = {
- "btrfs restore [options] ",
+