Re: missing checksums on reboot

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Blake Lewis wrote: > Well, 3.10 is what you get with the RHEL7.x distributions, so that's > why people are running it. > Apparently, it is "good enough" for many purposes. Nope. Btrfs in RHEL 7 is a technology preview, and ... "Technology

Re: missing checksums on reboot

Thanks, Duncan. Your points are very reasonable and I will be doing a bisect, as you suggest (though I don't know that the problem is fixed in later releases, just that we couldn't reproduce it readily). Just to be clear, I am not looking for support. I just hoped that perhaps this had been a

Re: missing checksums on reboot

Blake Lewis posted on Fri, 02 Dec 2016 12:36:29 -0800 as excerpted: > Well, 3.10 is what you get with the RHEL7.x distributions, so that's why > people are running it. > Apparently, it is "good enough" for many purposes. > > My real goal here is to understand the scope of the bug and whether any

Re: missing checksums on reboot

Well, 3.10 is what you get with the RHEL7.x distributions, so that's why people are running it. Apparently, it is "good enough" for many purposes. My real goal here is to understand the scope of the bug and whether any mitigation is possible. Of course, I don't expect anyone else to make a patch

Re: missing checksums on reboot

Hi, Le 02/12/2016 à 20:07, Blake Lewis a écrit : > Hi, all, this is my first posting to the mailing list. I am a > long-time file system guy who is just starting to take a serious > interest in btrfs. > > My company's product uses btrfs for its backing storage. We > maintain a log file to let

missing checksums on reboot

Hi, all, this is my first posting to the mailing list. I am a long-time file system guy who is just starting to take a serious interest in btrfs. My company's product uses btrfs for its backing storage. We maintain a log file to let us synchronize after reboots. In testing, we find that when