Hello again,
Just a quick question.
I did a full scrub and got no error at all
And a full check that gave me this :
#> btrfs check --check-data-csum -p /dev/sde6
Checking filesystem on /dev/sde6
UUID: 62db560b-a040-4c64-b613-6e7db033dc4d
checking extents [o]
checking free space cache [o]
check
Hi,
I finally did it : patched the kernel and removed the device.
As expected he did not scream since there was nothing at all on the device.
Now I'm checking that everything is fine:
scrub (in read only)
check (in read only)
but I think that everything will be OK
If not, I will rebuild the array
On 2016-09-20 15:55, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
wrote:
First off, as Chris said, if you can read the data and don't already have a
backup, that should be your first priority. This really is an edge case
that's not well tested, and the kernel tec
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>
>
> Le 20/09/2016 à 21:46, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 20/09/2016 à 21:11, Chris Murphy a écrit :
And no backup? Umm, I'd resolve that sooner than anything else.
>>> Yeah
Le 20/09/2016 à 22:18, Alexandre Poux a écrit :
>
> Le 20/09/2016 à 21:46, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>>> Le 20/09/2016 à 21:11, Chris Murphy a écrit :
And no backup? Umm, I'd resolve that sooner than anything else.
>>> Yeah you are abso
On 20/09/16 19:53, Alexandre Poux wrote:
> As for moving data to an another volume, since it's only data and
> nothing fancy (no subvolume or anything), a simple rsync would do the trick.
> My problem in this case is that I don't have enough available space
> elsewhere to move my data.
> That's why
Le 20/09/2016 à 21:46, Chris Murphy a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>>
>> Le 20/09/2016 à 21:11, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>>> And no backup? Umm, I'd resolve that sooner than anything else.
>> Yeah you are absolutely right, this was a temporary solution which cam
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>
> OK, good idea, but to be able to do that, I have to use the patch that
> allow me to mount the partition in rw, otherwise I won't be able to
> shrink it I suppose..
> And even with the patch I'm not sure that I won't get an IO error the
>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
wrote:
>> First off, as Chris said, if you can read the data and don't already have a
> backup, that should be your first priority. This really is an edge case
> that's not well tested, and the kernel technically doesn't officially
> support
Le 20/09/2016 à 21:43, Austin S. Hemmelgarn a écrit :
> On 2016-09-20 14:53, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 20/09/2016 à 20:38, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Alexandre Poux
>>> wrote:
Le 20/09/2016 à 19:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 20,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>
>
> Le 20/09/2016 à 21:11, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>> And no backup? Umm, I'd resolve that sooner than anything else.
> Yeah you are absolutely right, this was a temporary solution which came
> to be not that temporary.
> And I regret it alr
On 2016-09-20 14:53, Alexandre Poux wrote:
Le 20/09/2016 à 20:38, Chris Murphy a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
Le 20/09/2016 à 19:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
If I wanted to try to edit my partitions
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>
>
> Le 20/09/2016 à 20:38, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 20/09/2016 à 19:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
> If
Le 20/09/2016 à 20:56, Austin S. Hemmelgarn a écrit :
> On 2016-09-20 13:54, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Alexandre Poux
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If I wanted to try to edit my partitions with an hex editor, where
>>> would
>>> I find infos on how to do that ?
>>> I really don't
On 2016-09-20 13:54, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
If I wanted to try to edit my partitions with an hex editor, where would
I find infos on how to do that ?
I really don't want to go this way, but if this is relatively simple, it
may be worth to tr
Le 20/09/2016 à 20:38, Chris Murphy a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>>
>> Le 20/09/2016 à 19:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>>>
If I wanted to try to edit my partitions with an hex editor, where wou
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>
>
> Le 20/09/2016 à 19:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>>
>>> If I wanted to try to edit my partitions with an hex editor, where would
>>> I find infos on how to do that ?
>>> I really
Le 20/09/2016 à 19:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>
>> If I wanted to try to edit my partitions with an hex editor, where would
>> I find infos on how to do that ?
>> I really don't want to go this way, but if this is relatively simple, it
>>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
> If I wanted to try to edit my partitions with an hex editor, where would
> I find infos on how to do that ?
> I really don't want to go this way, but if this is relatively simple, it
> may be worth to try.
Simple is relative. First you'd
Le 20/09/2016 à 00:05, Alexandre Poux a écrit :
>
> Le 15/09/2016 à 23:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>>> Le 15/09/2016 à 18:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
> Thank you very much fo
Le 15/09/2016 à 23:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>> Le 15/09/2016 à 18:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
Thank you very much for your answers
Le 15/09/2016 à 17:38, Chris Mu
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>
> Le 15/09/2016 à 18:54, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>>> Thank you very much for your answers
>>>
>>> Le 15/09/2016 à 17:38, Chris Murphy a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:44 AM,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
> Thank you very much for your answers
>
> Le 15/09/2016 à 17:38, Chris Murphy a écrit :
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>>> Is it possible to do some king of a "btrfs delete missing" on this
>>> kind of set
Thank you very much for your answers
Le 15/09/2016 à 17:38, Chris Murphy a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
>> Is it possible to do some king of a "btrfs delete missing" on this
>> kind of setup, in order to recover access in rw to my other data, or
>>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Alexandre Poux wrote:
> I had a btrfs partition on a 6 disk array without raid (metadata in
> raid10, but data in single), and one of the disks just died.
>
> So I lost some of my data, ok, I knew that.
>
> But two question :
>
> *
>
> Is it possible to know
I had a btrfs partition on a 6 disk array without raid (metadata in
raid10, but data in single), and one of the disks just died.
So I lost some of my data, ok, I knew that.
But two question :
*
Is it possible to know (using metadata I suppose) what data I have
lost ?
*
Is it p
26 matches
Mail list logo
