Re: rootfs snapshots and rollback (i.e. testing updates)

2009-11-10 Thread John Dong
On Nov 10, 2009, at 4:53 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > Chris Ball wrote: >> Hi, >> > Is it possible, with current btrfs: >> Yes, I think so. >> > - to take a rootfs snapshot (i.e. prior to a major update), >> btrfsctl -s newsnap / >> > - do changes in the root filesystem (i.e. install maj

Re: rootfs snapshots and rollback (i.e. testing updates)

2009-11-10 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Chris Ball wrote: Hi, > Is it possible, with current btrfs: Yes, I think so. > - to take a rootfs snapshot (i.e. prior to a major update), btrfsctl -s newsnap / > - do changes in the root filesystem (i.e. install major update), > > - if we don't like what the major update did

Re: rootfs snapshots and rollback (i.e. testing updates)

2009-11-09 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, > Is it possible, with current btrfs: Yes, I think so. > - to take a rootfs snapshot (i.e. prior to a major update), btrfsctl -s newsnap / > - do changes in the root filesystem (i.e. install major update), > > - if we don't like what the major update did to the system >

Re: rootfs snapshots and rollback (i.e. testing updates)

2009-11-09 Thread John Dong
Hi, I asked this question about a month ago, and the answer is roughly "It's theoretically possible with minor feature implementations to btrfs, though nobody's done it yet" On Nov 9, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Is it possible, with current btrfs: - to take a rootfs snaps

rootfs snapshots and rollback (i.e. testing updates)

2009-11-09 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Is it possible, with current btrfs: - to take a rootfs snapshot (i.e. prior to a major update), - do changes in the root filesystem (i.e. install major update), - if we don't like what the major update did to the system (rootfs), "rollback" the snapshot and make it the "original" rootfs again