On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:12:17PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2014-04-25 13:24, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Steve Leung sjle...@shaw.ca wrote:
Hi list,
I've got a 3-device RAID1
Hi list,
I've got a 3-device RAID1 btrfs filesystem that started out life as
single-device.
btrfs fi df:
Data, RAID1: total=1.31TiB, used=1.07TiB
System, RAID1: total=32.00MiB, used=224.00KiB
System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=32.00KiB
System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00
Metadata,
On Apr 25, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Steve Leung sjle...@shaw.ca wrote:
Hi list,
I've got a 3-device RAID1 btrfs filesystem that started out life as
single-device.
btrfs fi df:
Data, RAID1: total=1.31TiB, used=1.07TiB
System, RAID1: total=32.00MiB, used=224.00KiB
System, DUP:
On 2014-04-25 13:24, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Steve Leung sjle...@shaw.ca wrote:
Hi list,
I've got a 3-device RAID1 btrfs filesystem that started out life as
single-device.
btrfs fi df:
Data, RAID1: total=1.31TiB, used=1.07TiB
System, RAID1: total=32.00MiB,
On 04/25/2014 12:12 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2014-04-25 13:24, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Steve Leung sjle...@shaw.ca wrote:
I've got a 3-device RAID1 btrfs filesystem that started out life as
single-device.
btrfs fi df:
Data, RAID1: total=1.31TiB,
On 2014-04-25 14:43, Steve Leung wrote:
On 04/25/2014 12:12 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2014-04-25 13:24, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Steve Leung sjle...@shaw.ca wrote:
I've got a 3-device RAID1 btrfs filesystem that started out life as
single-device.
btrfs fi
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:12:17PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2014-04-25 13:24, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Steve Leung sjle...@shaw.ca wrote:
Hi list,
I've got a 3-device RAID1 btrfs filesystem that started out life as
single-device.
btrfs fi
Austin S Hemmelgarn posted on Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:12:17 -0400 as
excerpted:
On 2014-04-25 13:24, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Steve Leung sjle...@shaw.ca wrote:
Assuming this is something that needs to be fixed, would I be able to
fix this by balancing the system
Steve Leung posted on Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:43:12 -0600 as excerpted:
On 04/25/2014 12:12 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
Personally, I would recommend making a full backup of all the data (tar
works wonderfully for this), and recreate the entire filesystem from
scratch, but passing all three
On Apr 25, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Steve Leung sjle...@shaw.ca wrote:
Once everything gets rebalanced though, I don't think I'd be missing out on
any features, would I?
The default nodesize/leafsize is 16KB since btrfs-progs v3.12. This isn't
changed with a balance. The difference between the
On Apr 25, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
But since -m/metadata includes -s/
system by default, and that was the intended way of doing things,
-f/force was added as necessary when doing only -s/system, since
presumably that was considered an artificial distinction, and
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Steve Leung sjle...@shaw.ca wrote:
Once everything gets rebalanced though, I don't think I'd be missing out on any
features, would I?
The default nodesize/leafsize is 16KB since btrfs-progs v3.12. This
isn't changed
Austin S Hemmelgarn posted on Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:07:40 -0400 as
excerpted:
I actually have a similar situation with how I have my desktop system
set up, when I go about recreating the filesystem (which I do every
time I upgrade either the tools or the kernel),
Wow. Given that I run a git
On Apr 25, 2014, at 8:56 PM, Steve Leung sjle...@shaw.ca wrote:
Incidentally, is there a way for someone to tell what the node size currently
is for a btrfs filesystem? I never noticed that info printed anywhere from
any of the btrfs utilities.
btrfs-show-super
In case anyone's
Chris Murphy posted on Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:41:43 -0600 as excerpted:
OK so somehow in Steve's conversion, metadata was converted from DUP to
RAID1 completely, but some portion of system was left as DUP,
incompletely converted to RAID1. It doesn't seem obvious that -mconvert
is what he'd use
Steve Leung posted on Fri, 25 Apr 2014 20:56:06 -0600 as excerpted:
Incidentally, is there a way for someone to tell what the node size
currently is for a btrfs filesystem? I never noticed that info printed
anywhere from any of the btrfs utilities.
btrfs-show-super device displays that,
16 matches
Mail list logo
