Re: safety of journal based fs (was: Re: still kworker at 100% cpu…)

Am Mon, 14 Dec 2015 10:10:51 +0100 schrieb Martin Steigerwald : > > But the problem is, when recovering journal, there is no journal of > > journal, to keep journal recovering safe from power loss. > > But the journal should be safe due to a journal commit being one >

safety of journal based fs (was: Re: still kworker at 100% cpu…)

Hi! Using a different subject for the journal fs related things which are off topic, but still interesting. Might make sense to move to fsdevel-ml or ext4/ XFS mailing lists? Otherwise, I suggest we focus on BTRFS here. Still wanted to reply. Am Montag, 14. Dezember 2015, 16:48:58 CET schrieb