Re: status page

2018-04-25 Thread Duncan
Gandalf Corvotempesta posted on Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:30:42 +0200 as excerpted: > For me, RAID56 is mandatory. Any ETA for a stable RAID56 ? > Is something we should expect this year, next year, next 10 years, > ? It's complicated... is the best short answer to that. Here's my take at a

Re: status page

2018-04-25 Thread Hugo Mills
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > 2018-04-25 13:39 GMT+02:00 Austin S. Hemmelgarn : > > Define 'stable'. > > Something ready for production use like ext or xfs with no critical > bugs or with easy data loss. > > > If you just want

Re: status page

2018-04-25 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
2018-04-25 13:39 GMT+02:00 Austin S. Hemmelgarn : > Define 'stable'. Something ready for production use like ext or xfs with no critical bugs or with easy data loss. > If you just want 'safe for critical data', it's mostly there already > provided that your admins and

Re: status page

2018-04-25 Thread Austin S. Hemmelgarn
On 2018-04-25 07:13, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: 2018-04-23 17:16 GMT+02:00 David Sterba : Reviewed and updated for 4.16, there's no change regarding the overall status, though 4.16 has some raid56 fixes. Thank you! Any ETA for a stable RAID56 ? (or, even better, for a

Re: status page

2018-04-25 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
2018-04-23 17:16 GMT+02:00 David Sterba : > Reviewed and updated for 4.16, there's no change regarding the overall > status, though 4.16 has some raid56 fixes. Thank you! Any ETA for a stable RAID56 ? (or, even better, for a stable btrfs ready for production use) I've seen many

Re: status page

2018-04-23 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 06:24:29PM +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > Hi to all, > as kernel 4.16 is out and 4.17 in in RC, would be possible to update > BTRFS status page > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Status to reflect 4.16 stability ? > > That page is still ba

status page

2018-04-19 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
Hi to all, as kernel 4.16 is out and 4.17 in in RC, would be possible to update BTRFS status page https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Status to reflect 4.16 stability ? That page is still based on kernel 4.15 (marked as EOL here: https://www.kernel.org/) Thank you -- To unsubscribe from

Re: Please update the BTRFS status page

2018-02-27 Thread David Sterba
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 03:05:48AM +0100, waxhead wrote: > The latest released kernel is 4.15 Updated. There's one pending ack for the degraded mount that's still mostly-ok but IMHO it's been fixed in 4.14 so it'll be OK. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"

Please update the BTRFS status page

2018-02-23 Thread waxhead
The latest released kernel is 4.15 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html