On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:44:03PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -766,6 +766,9 @@ static int btrfs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq,
> struct vfsmount *vfs)
> seq_puts(seq, ",inode_cache");
> if (btrfs_test_opt(root, SKIP
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 08:40:51PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
>> There was a patch to include the subvolume mount option into
>> /proc/mounts.
>> Did that make it into the kernel;
>> If not, what is the formal way to find out which subvolume is mounted;
> see /proc/self/mountinfo there is 'fs
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 01:52:15PM +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 07:18:24AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 12:53:21PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
> > > > It's quite old, but what was
Hi Christoph
On Monday, 06 February, 2012 13:18:24 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 12:53:21PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
> > > It's quite old, but what was this about;
> > >
> > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 07:18:24AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 12:53:21PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
> > > It's quite old, but what was this about;
> > >
> > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 12:53:21PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
> > It's quite old, but what was this about;
> >
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/4487
>
> Thanks, the patch looks ok and works as expected.
>
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
> It's quite old, but what was this about;
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/4487
Thanks, the patch looks ok and works as expected.
Goffredo, do you want to resend it? (The lock around the mnt_root is not
ne
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 08:40:51PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
> There was a patch to include the subvolume mount option into /proc/mounts.
> Did that make it into the kernel;
>
> If not, what is the formal way to find out which subvolume is mounted;
see /proc/self/mountinfo there is 'fs root'
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
>>> If not, what is the formal way to find out which subvolume is mounted;
>>
>> Not right now, see detailed answer to a similar question:
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/15385
> Assuming that pools with multiple s
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 08:40:51PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
>> There was a patch to include the subvolume mount option into
>> /proc/mounts.
>> Did that make it into the kernel;
>
> I havent' seen such patch, do you have a link?
>
>> If not, what is the formal way to find out which s
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 08:40:51PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
> There was a patch to include the subvolume mount option into /proc/mounts.
> Did that make it into the kernel;
I havent' seen such patch, do you have a link?
> If not, what is the formal way to find out which subvolume is mou
Hi,
There was a patch to include the subvolume mount option into /proc/mounts.
Did that make it into the kernel;
If not, what is the formal way to find out which subvolume is mounted;
Cheers,
Nikos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a messag
12 matches
Mail list logo
