[patch] btrfs: fix inode rbtree corruption

Hi, Ran into a problem stress testing my btrfs truncate conversion attempt... Unfortunately it was an existing btrfs problem. Fortunately I think I was able to fix it. Thanks, Nick -- btrfs: fix inode rbtree corruption Node may not be inserted over existing node. This causes inode tree corrupti

btrfs failing fsx-linux

Hi Chris, Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree. This makes it a bit hard for me to test my btrfs truncate conversion patch unfortunately, though it does seem pretty stable so I will probably

Re: btrfs failing fsx-linux

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous > inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree. > > This makes it a bit hard for me to test my btrfs truncate conversion p

Re: [patch] btrfs: fix inode rbtree corruption

2009/8/19 Nick Piggin : > Hi, > > Ran into a problem stress testing my btrfs truncate conversion attempt... > Unfortunately it was an existing btrfs problem. Fortunately I think I > was able to fix it. > > Thanks, > Nick > > -- > btrfs: fix inode rbtree corruption > > Node may not be inserted over

Re: [patch] btrfs: fix inode rbtree corruption

On Wed, Aug 19 2009, Yan, Zheng wrote: > 2009/8/19 Nick Piggin : > > Hi, > > > > Ran into a problem stress testing my btrfs truncate conversion attempt... > > Unfortunately it was an existing btrfs problem. Fortunately I think I > > was able to fix it. > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > > > -- > > btrfs

Re: Why does stat() return invalid st_dev field for btrfs ??

On Mon, Aug 17 2009, Mark Lord wrote: > Kay Sievers wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 22:47, Mark Lord wrote: >>> Chris / list, >>> >>> stat(2) seems to return invalid major/minor device info >>> for btrfs filesystems. >>> >>> Why? Is this a bug? >> >> This is not invalid and not a bug. It's a sup