Re: 2.6.36-rc1 btrfs still unstable

2010-08-17 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
On Mo 16.Aug'10 at 11:45:29 -0400, Chris Ball wrote: > >Note that Btrfs does not yet have a fsck tool that can fix errors. >While Btrfs is stable on a stable machine, it is currently possible >to corrupt a filesystem irrecoverably if your machine crashes or >loses power. This will

Re: 2.6.36-rc1 btrfs still unstable

2010-08-17 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > Note that Btrfs does not yet have a fsck tool that can fix errors. >   While Btrfs is stable on a stable machine, it is currently possible >   to corrupt a filesystem irrecoverably if your machine crashes or >   loses power.  This will be fixed

snapshot limit?

2010-08-17 Thread K. Richard Pixley
Is there a limit to the number of snapshots that can exist on a file system concurrently? Did I read something here recently about a limit to the number of paths by which a file could be known? If there are limits, then what happens when I bump into or exceed that limit? --rich -- To unsu

Re: snapshot limit?

2010-08-17 Thread K. Richard Pixley
On 8/17/10 11:05 , Dhiru Kholia wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:41 AM, K. Richard Pixley mailto:r...@noir.com>> wrote: > Is there a limit to the number of snapshots that can exist on a file system > concurrently? According to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/btrfs "You can create as many s

Re: snapshot limit?

2010-08-17 Thread David Pottage
On 17/08/10 19:40, K. Richard Pixley wrote: > On 8/17/10 11:05 , Dhiru Kholia wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:41 AM, K. Richard Pixley > > wrote: >> > Is there a limit to the number of snapshots that can exist on a file >> system >> > concurrently? >> >> According to