On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
>
> Hallo, Carl,
>
> Du meintest am 20.01.11:
>
> >> If you shutdown the system, at the reboot you should "scan" all the
> >> device in order to find the btrfs ones
> >>
> >> # find the btrfs device
> >> btrfs device scan
>
> > This must be don
I've been experimenting lately with btrfs RAID1 implementation and have to say
that it is performing quite well, but there are few problems:
* when I purposefully damage partitions on which btrfs stores data (for
example, by changing the case of letters) it will read the other copy and
retu
Ok, thanks, I will read the project wiki more carefully then :-)
Beware however that Wikipedia is the first place to look for information for a
lot of people (whether this is a good practice or not) and it currently does
not provide a very good advertisement to btrfs.
Kind regards
Le 21 janv. 2
On Friday 21 of January 2011 09:11:57 Benoît Thiébault wrote:
> Ok, thanks, I will read the project wiki more carefully then :-)
> Beware however that Wikipedia is the first place to look for information
> for a lot of people (whether this is a good practice or not) and it
> currently does not prov
Hi,
I hit the same bug again I think:
[291835.724344] [ cut here ]
[291835.724376] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:836!
[291835.724401] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP
[291835.724424] last sysfs file:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cache/index2/shared_cpu_map
[291835.72446
please try patch attached below, Thanks.
---
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
index b37d723..49d6b13 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -1158,6 +1158,7 @@ static int clone_backref_node(struct
btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
new_node->byte
On Thu 20 January 2011 22:55:54 Hubert Kario wrote:
> You still have a btrfs on /dev/sdc, do a
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc bs=8192
> (overkill, but I don't remember which blocks have to be zeroed to destroy
> btrfs superblock)
I gave up and started over. Maybe it should be clarified in the wi
On Friday, January 21, 2011 11:16:49 cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
> On Thu 20 January 2011 22:55:54 Hubert Kario wrote:
> > You still have a btrfs on /dev/sdc, do a
> > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc bs=8192
> > (overkill, but I don't remember which blocks have to be zeroed to destroy
> > btrfs super
Hallo, Goffredo,
Du meintest am 20.01.11:
> To add another disk you don't have to run mkfs.btrfs. For example:
> # add the first disk
> mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb
> # mount the disk
> mount /dev/sdb /media/backups
> # add another disk to the first one
> btrfs device add /dev/sdc /media/backup
> Note1
Hallo, Chris,
Du meintest am 20.01.11:
>> Is there a planned date for the final release of btrfs?
> A final release? We'll keep improving things for a long time. The
> biggest missing feature today is btrfsck, which I'm working on full
> time right now.
Could it be possible to tell somewhere
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:54:00AM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Hallo, Chris,
>
> Du meintest am 20.01.11:
>
> >> Is there a planned date for the final release of btrfs?
>
> > A final release? We'll keep improving things for a long time. The
> > biggest missing feature today is btrfsck, which
Hallo, Goffredo,
Du meintest am 20.01.11:
> To add another disk you don't have to run mkfs.btrfs. For example:
> # add the first disk
> mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb
> # mount the disk
> mount /dev/sdb /media/backups
> # add another disk to the first one
> btrfs device add /dev/sdc /media/backup
> Note1
Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 21.01.11:
>> Could it be possible to tell somewhere the actual version?
>>
>> Sometimes I download via git,
>>
>> > stable.git>
>> and I never have found which version that is; "version.sh" tells
>> something wrong.
> $ git log
Ok - last changes from October 6, 20
On Viernes, 21 de Enero de 2011 10:54:00 Helmut Hullen escribió:
> And I never have seen somethin like "Changelog" - that would be fine
> too.
Check the wiki, I keep that updated:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page#News
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib
I can make the latest btrfs from Chris hang my system.
I got a fresh clone yesterday from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstagle.git
Built and installed both tools and kernel into Ubuntu 10.1
Hallo, Diego,
Du meintest am 21.01.11:
>> And I never have seen somethin like "Changelog" - that would be fine
>> too.
> Check the wiki, I keep that updated:
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page#News
Thank you - that's more simple for me than first cloning via "git clone"
and t
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:55:00PM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Hallo, Diego,
>
> Du meintest am 21.01.11:
>
> >> And I never have seen somethin like "Changelog" - that would be fine
> >> too.
>
> > Check the wiki, I keep that updated:
> > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page#News
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
I've just finished testing my btrfs installation.
Kernel 2.6.37, btrfs-progs from 2010-10-06
Again the same problem as mourned last year: the smaller of the 2 disks
sets the capacity.
Where is the problem: is it a kernel problem (and I have to wait for the
next kernel re
Hallo, Hugo,
Du meintest am 21.01.11:
>>> Check the wiki, I keep that updated:
>>> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page#News
>>
>> Thank you - that's more simple for me than first cloning via "git
>> clone" and then running "git log".
>Once you've done a git clone, you can keep
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:20:34AM -0700, Rodney Beede wrote:
> Any tools to go about zeroing about the free space on a btrfs file
> system so I can shrink the VMware vmdk virtual disk?
>
> I ran the VMware command, but the dynamic disk is still really big. I
> presume it is due to free space tha
On 01/21/2011 12:10 AM, Carl Cook wrote:
> On Thu 20 January 2011 14:13:22 Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>> To add another disk you don't have to run mkfs.btrfs. For example:
>>
>> # add the first disk
>> mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb
>> # mount the disk
>> mount /dev/sdb /media/backups
>>
>> # add another disk
Well thanks to some help from you guys I seem to have my backup server almost
fully running and functional with rsync. Amazing functions, this snapshotting
and rsync.
I still don't know why I cannot remove snapshots though. (Debian Testing with
2.6.32-28)
And I don't know how to reach out fr
On 01/21/2011 08:07 PM, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
>
> Well thanks to some help from you guys I seem to have my backup server almost
> fully running and functional with rsync. Amazing functions, this
> snapshotting and rsync.
>
> I still don't know why I cannot remove snapshots though. (Deb
Kernel 2.6.32.x is to old for snapshot deletion, you will have to use
something more recent
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 11:07 -0800, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
> Well thanks to some help from you guys I seem to have my backup server almost
> fully running and functional with rsync. Amazing functions
On Fri 21 January 2011 10:42:39 Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> > Thanks Goffredo but as I say, I did this and it responds with
> > "ERROR: error adding the device '/dev/sdc'"
> > .. it doesn't give a clue.
>
> In your email you wrote that before adding the device you format it.
> Anyway I don't th
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 09:59:46AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> Let see if I can match up the terminology and layers a bit:
>>
>> LVM Physical Volume == Btrfs disk == ZFS disk / vdevs
>> LVM Volume Group == Btrfs "filesystem" == ZFS storage poo
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:07 AM, wrote:
>
> Well thanks to some help from you guys I seem to have my backup server almost
> fully running and functional with rsync. Amazing functions, this
> snapshotting and rsync.
>
> I still don't know why I cannot remove snapshots though. (Debian Testing w
On 21/01/11 17:20, Rodney Beede wrote:
> Any tools to go about zeroing about the free space on a btrfs file
> system so I can shrink the VMware vmdk virtual disk?
>
> I ran the VMware command, but the dynamic disk is still really big. I
> presume it is due to free space that isn't zeroed out.
Does
Xfstests 224 will just sit there and spin for ever until eventually we give up
flushing delalloc and exit. On my box this took several hours. I could not
interrupt this process either, even though we use INTERRUPTIBLE. So do 2 things
1) Keep us from looping over and over again without reclaimin
On Fri 21 January 2011 11:44:24 Freddie Cash wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
>
> ssh someu...@mythtv.pc "/path/to/some/script stop"
>
> /path/to/your/rsync/script
>
> ssh someu...@mythtv.pc "/path/to/some/script start"
Ho-lee crap, this is fantastic. Everything seems to work. I find though that
if I stop
30 matches
Mail list logo
